According to reporter Jacobs, referee company PGMOL admitted that VAR was involved in the error in Chelsea's Fulham game, and Howard Webber contacted Fulham for this. According to reports, VAR referee Sarisbry's intervention in penalty decis...
According to reporter Jacobs, referee company PGMOL admitted that VAR was involved in the error in Chelsea's Fulham game, and Howard Webber contacted Fulham for this. According to reports, VAR referee Sarisbry's intervention in penalty decisions does not meet the standards set by PGMOL (Professional Competition Referee Co., Ltd.) for VAR intervention. Webber contacted Fulham directly yesterday.
In addition, Liverpool vs. Arsenal's referee team was adjusted today, and the former VAR referee Saris Brie was replaced by John Brooks. According to several British reporters, Sarisbry mistakenly determined that Fulham 18-year-old Jin scored an invalid goal and was suspended from the sentry.
Related controversial penalty: In the 22nd minute of the game, Fulham made a one-on-one chance, and 18-year-old young player Jin dunked the defender and pushed the ball into the goal. After VAR reminded, the referee went to the sidelines to look back and finally determined that Munis had a foul on Charoba first and the goal was invalid.
The referee read out the penalty explanation: After review, Fulham No. 9 player made a reckless foul and stepped on the Chelsea defender's foot, so we canceled the goal and Chelsea restarted the free kick. No further punishment.
